Operator
FIRST CLASS HOLDING s.r.o.
The legal and operating carrier of the public web and the subsequent mandate entry.
Legal / Privacy
EX AI HUB operates in a due diligence context where personal and corporate data may enter a mandate. This page explains the privacy boundaries that apply before and during mandate intake.
Privacy boundaries
In due diligence, the legitimacy of processing depends on a clear purpose, limited boundaries, and a disciplined review process.
What this page covers
This summary outlines the privacy baseline for the public site and mandate intake.
Decision context
Personal and corporate review are framed as risk-based due diligence tied to an explicit business decision.
Sensitive subjects
If a mandate raises special-category or jurisdictional risk, the review boundary is calibrated before intake proceeds.
Export discipline
Redaction and do-not-include discipline remain part of the review layer, not a last-minute manual improvisation.
Operational privacy
The page explains what is typically processed, why, and for how long, without making promises the operating model cannot keep.
Practical translation
Policy text matters, but privacy boundaries also need to hold in day-to-day case handling.
Typical inputs include submitted subject context, supporting materials, and operational metadata needed for case intake and delivery.
The legal basis and safeguards are assessed against the actual decision context, not only the module name.
Access follows tenant, role, and review need; sensitive materials do not circulate without a named owner.
Retention follows review windows, legal necessity, and the cleanup discipline confirmed for the mandate.
Minimisation
If a data point cannot support the review or the final decision, it does not stay in the active review set.
Human review
AI-assisted throughput may accelerate extraction, but privacy-sensitive final statements remain under analyst control.
Client requests
Questions about mandate boundaries, retention, or safeguards are captured in a named review path, not as a side note.
Contact and escalation
The legal operator and contact route remain visible for policy review, procurement, and mandate preparation.
Contact points
Sensitive mandates keep legal, privacy, and procurement follow-up on one named contact path.
Privacy policy
This document is the active reference in the current language.
Current documentTerms of use
The matching document stays available for the same legal, privacy, and procurement review.
OpenCookies
The matching document stays available for the same legal, privacy, and procurement review.
OpenDPA and privacy contact
The matching document stays available for the same legal, privacy, and procurement review.
OpenLegal documents
All legal pages remain separately accessible so legal, procurement, or security teams can open them directly from the public site.
Privacy
This document is the active reference in the current language.
Current documentTerms
The matching document stays available for the same legal, privacy, and procurement review.
Open terms of useCookies
The matching document stays available for the same legal, privacy, and procurement review.
Open cookie policyRelated review pages
Use these pages when published legal text needs to be matched against operating controls, commercial framing, or the next contact step.
Contact
The contact page keeps the operator, introduction lead, and next-step path visible when the published documents do not resolve the review.
Open contactNext step
The public web remains a briefing layer. Request access and, once approved, the detailed workflow, intake paths, and next steps become available inside the member area.
Access frame